Webs internacionales
Consulte su vacuna

BBI

< Volver
Selección de artículos Marzo 2018
1

La ITSC con péptidos de Lolium demuestra efectividad clínica con 3 semanas de tratamiento.

Short-course of grass allergen peptides immunotherapy over three weeks reduces seasonal symptoms in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with/without Asthma: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Mösges R, Bachert C, Panzner P, Calderon MA, Haazen L, Pirotton S et al
Allergy. 2018 Mar 7. doi: 10.1111/all.13433. [Epub ahead of print]

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy with peptide hydrolysates from Lolium perenne (LPP) is an alternative treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis with or without asthma. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of acumulative dose of 170 μg LPP administered subcutaneously over 3 weeks.

METHODS

In a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial, 554 adults with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were randomized (1:2 ratio) to receive 8 subcutaneous injections of placebo or 170 μg LPP administered in increasing doses in 4 visits over 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) measured over the peak pollen season. Reactivity to conjunctival provocation test (CPT) and quality of life (QOL) were assessed as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The mean reduction in CSMS in the LPP vs. placebo group was -15.5% (p=0.041) during the peak period and -17.9% (p= 0.029) over the entire pollen season. LPP treated group had a reduced reactivity to CPT (p<0.001) and, during the pollen season, a lower rhinoconjunctivitis QOL global score (p=0.005) compared to placebo group. Mostly mild and WAO grade 1 early systemic reaction (ESR) were observed ≤ 30 min in 10.5% of LPP-treated patients, whereas 3 patients with a medical history of asthma (<1%) experienced a serious ESR that resolved with rescue medication.

CONCLUSIONS

LPP administered over 3 weeks before the grass pollen season significantly reduced seasonal symptoms, was generally safe and well-tolerated.
2

¿Y si los cambios en la triptasa durante la primera administración de inmunoterapia de venenos pudieran predecir futuras reacciones adversas?

Tryptase increase on the first day of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy might be a predictor of future systemic reactions during treatment.
Vega-Castro A, Alonso-Llamazares A, Cárdenas R, Beitia JM, Mateo B, Alvarez-Twose I, Blanco C
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2018 Mar 28:0. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0258. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29589586

BACKGROUND

Serum tryptase (ST) decreases in long-term venom immunotherapy (VIT). A circadian tryptase variation with a small decrease has been found after sting challenge. Both findings have been related to successful VIT.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether variation (increase or decrease) in ST on the first day of VIT is associated with the likehood of future systemic adverse reactions (SAR) during treatment.

METHODS

We prospectively studied patients who underwent cluster VIT and continued it for at least 6 months. ST was measured on the first day of VIT, before the first dose (pre-IT tryptase) and after the last dose (post-IT tryptase). Differences between patients’ groups (with and without SAR) were analysed.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty VIT were administered to 150 patients. The median baseline ST value was 4.3 μg/L. A total of 25 VIT (15.6%) were associated with SAR. In 64% of the 25 patients with SAR, post-IT tryptase value was higher than pre-IT tryptase level; the median increment was 19% in these patients. We found a significant relation between this increase in tryptase level on the first day of VIT and future SAR (risk ratio 7.6). This elevation was independent of the VIT scheduled day and severity of the SAR, as well as of the basal ST value.

CONCLUSIONS

A slight increase in tryptase on the first day of VIT is an independent variable strongly related to a high risk of future SAR. This simple biomarker could be helpful to improve patients´ safety.
3

Identificadas subpoblaciones linfocitarias posibles predictoras de éxito en ITSL frente a ácaros.

Identification of specifically reduced Th2 cell subsets in allergic rhinitis patients after sublingual immunotherapy.
Ihara F, Sakurai D, Yonekura S, Iinuma T, Yagi R et al
Allergy. 2018 Mar 8. doi: 10.1111/all.13436. [Epub ahead of print]

BACKGROUND

Although Th2 cells are well known to play important roles in allergic diseases including allergic rhinitis (AR), the factors that induce and sustain the pathogenesis of AR remain unclear. The recent development of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is expected to allow changes to the underlying pathogenesis of AR. However, which Th2 cell subsets are important in house dust mite-induced AR (HDM-AR), the influence of SLIT on the pathogenic Th2 cells, and the association of Th2 cell subsets with SLIT efficacy have not been clarified.

METHODS

The cytokine production and frequency of HDM-reactive T cell subsets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were evaluated using flow cytometry in 89 HDM-AR patients (placebo (n=43) and HDM 300 IR (n=46)) who participated in a placebo-controlled study of SLIT with HDM tablets. All patients provided samples both before treatment as a baseline and at the end of the 52-week study. The PBMCs were stained with CellTrace™ Violet (CTV) before culture with HDM extract, and HDM-reactive T cells were detected as the proliferated cells with diminished CTV.

RESULTS

HDM-reactive IL-5+ IL-13+ CD27- CD161+ CD4+ cells and ST2+ CD45RO+ CD4+ cells were observed in the peripheral blood from each patient with HDM-AR; these cells significantly decreased after SLIT in the group treated with active tablets. HDM-reactive ST2+ CD45RO+ CD4+ cells were significantly lower in active-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergen-reactive ST2+ CD45RO+ CD4+ cells or those combined with IL-5+ IL-13+ CD27- CD161+ CD4+ cells may be useful as markers indicating the successful treatment of SLIT. These cells may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AR as pathogenic memory Th2 cells.
4

Revisión sistemática sobre la ITE en asma infantil.

Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Pediatric Asthma: A Systematic Review.
Rice JL, Diette GB, Suarez-Cuervo C, Brigham EP, Lin SY et al
Pediatrics. 2018 Mar 23. pii: e20173833. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3833. [Epub ahead of print]

CONTEXT

Treatment options for allergic asthma include allergen avoidance, pharmacotherapy, and allergen immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

Summarize and update current evidence for the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in pediatric allergic asthma.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 1, 2005, through May 8, 2017), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. We reevaluated trials from our 2013 systematic review.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies with children ≤18 years of age in which researchers reported on pre-specified outcomes and had an intervention arm receiving aeroallergen SCIT or SLIT. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for efficacy. RCTs and non-RCTs were included for safety outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers extracted data. We included 40 studies (17 SCIT trials, 11 SLIT trials, 8 non-RCTs for SCIT safety, and 4 non-RCTs for SLIT safety).

RESULTS

We found moderate-strength evidence that SCIT reduces long-term asthma medication use. We found low-strength evidence that SCIT improves asthma-related quality of life and forced expiratory volume in 1 second. There was also low-strength evidence that SLIT improves medication use and forced expiratory volume in 1 second. There was insufficient evidence on asthma symptoms and health care use.

LIMITATIONS

There were no trials in which researchers evaluated asthma symptoms using a validated tool. Study characteristics and outcomes were reported heterogeneously.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with allergic asthma, SCIT may reduce long-term asthma medication use. Local and systemic allergic reactions are common, but anaphylaxis is reported rarely.
5

Aumentar la tasa de tratamiento con inmunoterapia subcutánea es coste-efectivo.

Impact of increasing treatment rates on cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in respiratory allergy: a decision analytic modelling approach.
Richter AK, Klimek L, Merk HF, Mülleneisen N, Renz H, WehrmannW et al
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0970-6. [Epub ahead of print]

BACKGROUND

Specific immunotherapy is the only causal treatment in respiratory allergy. Due to high treatment cost and possible severe side effects subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is not indicated in all patients. Nevertheless, reported treatment rates seem to be low. This study aims to analyze the effects of increasing treatment rates of SCIT in respiratory allergy in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

METHODS

A state-transition Markov model simulates the course of disease of patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma and both diseases over 10 years including a symptom-free state and death. Treatment comprises symptomatic pharmacotherapy alone or combined with SCIT. The model compares two strategies of increased and status quo treatment rates. Transition probabilities are based on routine data. Costs are calculated from the societal perspective applying German unit costs to literature-derived resource consumption. QALYs are determined by translating the mean change in non-preference-based quality of life scores to a change in utility. Key parameters are subjected to deterministic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Increasing treatment rates is a cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3484€/QALY compared to the status quo. The most influential parameters are SCIT discontinuation rates, treatment effects on the transition probabilities and cost of SCIT. Across all parameter variations, the best case leads to dominance of increased treatment rates while the worst case ICER is 34,315€/QALY. Excluding indirect cost leads to a twofold increase in the ICER.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures to increase SCIT initiation rates should be implemented and also address improving adherence.
6

¿La ITE previene el asma? Se necesitan más estudios aleatorizados para demostrarlo.

Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis as a Strategy for Preventing Asthma.
Morjaria JB, Caruso M, Emma R, Russo C, Polosa R et al
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Mar 24;18(4):23. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0781-y

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of allergic rhinitis (AR) on the development of asthma and to update readers on recent literature suggesting that early treatment of allergic subjects with immunotherapy may prevent asthma onset.

RECENT FINDINGS

AR is frequently associated with asthma, leading to the concept that these two conditions are different aspects of the same disease. There is increasing evidence that AR precedes the onset of asthmatic symptoms and current treatment strategies are beneficial in symptom control with no impact prevention. There is limited knowledge about the risk factors responsible for the progression of AR to asthma, though recent data supports the notion that it is possible to prevent asthma onset by allergen immunotherapy. Despite significant advances in specific immunotherapy (SIT) therapy strengthening its efficacy in AR and possible prevention of progression to asthma, the adoption of this therapeutic strategy is still restricted in comparison to therapies directed towards treatment of AR symptoms. Unlike corticosteroids and other symptomatic therapies, the benefit of SIT treatment in allergic individuals has been shown to prevent the development of allergic conditions. Hence, large well-conducted randomized clinical trials with long-term efficacy of SIT are required to confirm or refute the concept that SIT may abrogate the progression of AR to asthma in patients.
7

¿Los extractos actuales de ITE para perro y gato cubren nuestras necesidades?

Dog and Cat Allergies: Current State of Diagnostic Approaches and Challenges.
Chan SK, Leung DYM
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018 Mar;10(2):97-105. doi: 10.4168/aair.2018.10.2.97.

BACKGROUND

Allergies to dogs and cats affect 10%-20% of the population worldwide and is a growing public health concern as these rates increase. Given the prevalence of detectable dog and cat allergens even in households without pets, there is a critical need to accurately diagnose and treat patients to reduce morbidity and mortality from exposure. The ability to diagnose cat sensitization is good, in contrast to dogs. Component resolved diagnostics of sensitization to individual allergenic proteins will dramatically improve diagnosis. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge regarding allergies to dogs and cats, recent advances, therapies such as subcutaneous immunotherapy, and discusses important areas to improve diagnosis and therapy.
8

Inmunoterapia sublingual en comprimidos para la alergia a abedul: segura e inmunógena, pero eficacia clínica no concluyente en un ensayo de fase 2.

Immunotherapy With the SQ Tree SLIT-tablet in Adults and Adolescents With Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis.
Mäkelä MJ, Gyllfors P, Valovirta E, Steffensen MA, Grønager PM, Savolainen J et al
Clin Ther. 2018 Mar 15. pii: S0149-2918(18)30062-6. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.02.012. [Epub ahead of print]

PURPOSE

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) in its subcutaneous and sublingual forms is currently a well-established and experimentally supported treatment for respiratory allergy and hymenoptera venom allergy. There have been advances in its use linked strictly to the advancement in the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of allergy, the production of well-characterized extracts, and diagnostic techniques. The use of AIT in asthma and the application of new approaches are expanding. We briefly review the advances and concerns in the use of AIT.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus.

FINDINGS

The most recent and clinically relevant literature was selected and reviewed.

IMPLICATIONS

The introduction of high-quality products supported by large dose-finding trials has yielded better defined indications, contraindications, and modalities of use. Some specific products in tablet form have recently been approved in the United States. Sublingual immunotherapy has been found to be effective in asthma, which until recently had been a matter of debate. Another promising therapy is oral and sublingual desensitization for food allergy, for which encouraging results have recently been reported. In the near future, other options will be available, including new routes of administration (intralymphatic and epicutaneous), allergoids, engineered allergens, and peptides. The use of component-resolved diagnosis techniques will further refine and target AIT prescriptions.
9

La inmunoterapia sublingual en niños asmáticos, revisada con lupa por expertos.

A critical appraisal on AIT in childhood asthma.
Ferrando M, Racca F, Madeira LNG, Heffler E, Passalacqua G et al
Clin Mol Allergy. 2018 Mar 6;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12948-018-0085-8. eCollection 2018.

ABSTRACT

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment approved for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma and represents a suitable therapeutic option, especially in childhood, to modify the progression of respiratory allergic diseases. Starting from the previous "generic class effect" evaluation, as testified by the numerous meta analyses, AIT is now considered a product-specific pathogenic-oriented treatment.

BACKGROUND

AIT was empirically proposed more than one century ago in the subcutaneous form (SCIT), but the IgE-mediated mechanism of allergy was elucidated only after 50 years of clinical use of the treatment. The sublingual administration (SLIT) was developed during the 1980 ties, to achieve an improvement in safety and convenience. While SCIT is approved in the United States for the treatment of asthmatic patients with more than 12 years, so far few trials evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of SLIT in children with allergic asthma, although the indications and some aspects remain unclear. Certainly, due to compliance problems, the age below 3 years may be reasonably considered a practical contraindication.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that some specific AIT products are effective and approved as drugs (AIFA, EMA, FDA), the use in children is still debated. Some aspects still need robust confirm: (a) the safety of AIT in asthma; (b) the optimal regimen of administration; (c) the role of AIT as preventative treatment for asthma development.
10

¿Podemos predecir o modificar la evolución de la alergia alimentaria?

How to predict and improve prognosis of food allergy.
Dahdah L, Pecora V, Riccardi C, Fierro V, Valluzzi R, Mennini M
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Mar 29. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000446. [Epub ahead of print]

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of food allergy is increasing. More children are being diagnosed with food allergies, and it is taking longer to outgrow them, among those who develop tolerance. The aim of this review is to draw the profile of the persistent food allergic, so that prevention strategies can be developed and active treatment set up.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many determinants are involved in food allergy prognosis: ethnicity and sex, type of food, innate immune system, eliciting dose, sensitization status and other biomarkers determination, gut microbiome composition, and the presence of comorbidities. Once identified, a persistent food allergy could be conveyed to active treatments, such as oral immunotherapy or the use of biologics, always taking into account their experimental nature.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of prognostic factors and phenotypes of food allergy is crucial in decision-making when it comes to food allergy prevention and management. A good classification of the allergic patient allows to determine the degree of exclusion diets and the timing of the reintroduction of avoided food when possible. In the cases of persistent and severe food allergy, many promising interventions are emerging which could improve prognosis and quality of care.

Registro y seguimiento de vacunas

Acceder
Nuestro sitio utiliza cookies para recopilar información sobre su dispositivo y su actividad de navegación. Utilizamos estos datos para mejorar el sitio, garantizar la seguridad y ofrecer contenido personalizado. Puede gestionar sus preferencias de cookies haciendo clic aquí.
Aceptar cookies Configurar Rechazar cookies
Información básica de las cookies
Este sitio web utiliza cookies y/o tecnologías similares que almacenan y recuperan información cuando navega. En general, estas tecnologías pueden tener finalidades muy diversas como, por ejemplo, reconocerte como usuario, obtener información sobre tus hábitos de navegación o personalizar la forma en la que se muestran los contenidos. Los usos específicos que hacemos de estas tecnologías se describen a continuación. Por defecto, todas las cookies están deshabilitadas, excepto las técnicas, que son necesarias para el funcionamiento del sitio web. Si desea obtener más información o ejercer sus derechos en materia de protección de datos, puede consultar nuestra Política de cookies".
Aceptar cookies Configurar
Cookies técnicas necesarias Siempre activas
Las cookies técnicas son estrictamente necesarias para que nuestro sitio web funcione y puedas navegar por él. Este tipo de cookies son aquellas que, por ejemplo, nos permiten identificarte, darte acceso a determinadas partes restringidas de la página si es necesario, o recordar diferentes opciones o servicios ya seleccionados por ti, como tus preferencias de privacidad. Por tanto, están activadas por defecto, no siendo necesaria su autorización. Mediante la configuración de su navegador puede bloquear o alertar de la presencia de este tipo de cookies, aunque dicho bloqueo afectará al correcto funcionamiento de las diferentes funcionalidades de nuestra página web.
Cookies de análisis
Las cookies de análisis son las utilizadas para llevar a cabo el análisis anónimo del comportamiento de los usuarios de la web y que permiten medir la actividad del usuario y elaborar perfiles de navegación con el fin objetivo de mejorar los sitios web.
Confirmar preferencias
Title
Popupcontent
Contacta con nosotros
ALLERGY THERAPEUTICS IBERICA, S.L.U., como responsable del tratamiento de sus datos, tratará los mismos con la finalidad de dar respuesta a la consulta y/o petición que nos realiza a través de este formulario de contacto. Puede ejercer losrnderechos de acceso, rectificación, supresión, así como otros derechos consultando la información adicional detallada sobre Protección de Datos en nuestra política de privacidad.
Aceptar
0