This European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) guideline provides recommendations for the management of IgEmediated food allergy and was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Following the confirmation of IgE-mediated food allergy diagnosis, allergen avoidance and dietary advice (with support of a specialised dietitian, if possible) together with the provision of a written treatment plan, education on the recognition of allergic symptoms and prescription of medication including adrenaline using an auto-injector are essential. Patients with significant anxiety and requirement for coping strategies may benefit from support from a clinical psychologist. As immunomodulatory interventions, omalizumab is suggested for treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy in children from the age of 1 and adults; and oral allergen-specific immunotherapy is recommended for children and adolescents with peanut allergy and suggested for milk and egg allergies (generally after 4 years of age for milk and egg). Sublingual and epicutaneous immunotherapy are suggested for peanut allergy but are not yet available at the point of care. Future research into disease modifying treatments for IgE mediated food allergy are highly needed, with standardised and patient-focused protocols and outcomes.

Few studies have examined long-term outcomes following oral immunotherapy (OIT); none have examined long-term risks and benefits associated with distinct clinical outcomes (desensitization, remission).

Participants completing the probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) -003 randomized trial were enrolled in a follow-on study, PPOIT-003LT. Peanut ingestion, reactions, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were monitored prospectively. Outcomes at 1- year and 2-years post-treatment were examined by treatment group and by post-OIT clinical outcome (remission, desensitization without remission [DWR], allergic).

86% (151/176) of eligible children enrolled. Post treatment peanut ingestion at 2-years post-treatment were similar for PPOIT (86.7%) and OIT (78.7%) groups, both higher than placebo (10.3%). Reactions reduced over time for all treatment and clinical outcome groups (PPOIT 31.7% to 23.3%, OIT 37.7% to 19.7%, placebo 13.8% to 6.9%; remission 27.5% to 15.9%; DWR 57.9% to 36.8%; allergic 11.6% to 7%). At 2-years post-treatment, similar proportions of remission and allergic participants reported reactions (RD 0.09 (95%CI -0.03, 0.20), p = .127), whereas more DWR participants reported reactions than remission (remission vs DWR: RD -0.21 (95%CI -0.39; -0.03), p = .02) and allergic (DWR vs allergic: RD 0.30 (95%CI 0.13, 0.47), p = .001) participants. At 2-years post-treatment, 0% remission versus 5.3% DWR versus 2.3% allergic participants reported adrenaline injector usage. Remission participants had significantly greater HRQOL improvement (adjusted for baseline) compared with both DWR (MD -0.54 (95%CI -0.99, -0.10), p = .017) and allergic (MD -0.82 (95%CI -1.25, -0.38), p < .001).

By 2-years post-treatment, remission participants reported fewer reactions, less severe reactions and greater HRQOL improvement compared with DWR and allergic participants, indicating that remission is the patient-preferred treatment outcome over desensitization or remaining allergic.

Infants aged <1 year with confirmed food allergies generally need to avoid causative foods completely for a certain period. Low-dose oral food challenges (LD-OFCs) may be an effective strategy for safely introducing small amounts of causative foods to individuals with food allergies. This study clarified the safety of LD-OFCs in infants aged <1 year with food allergies.

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of LD-OFCs performed in infants aged <1 year allergic to hen's egg, cow's milk, or wheat between April 2014 and October 2017. Approximately 1/25th 1/20th of the egg white from a heated whole hen's egg, 3 mL heated cow's milk, and 2 g wheat noodles (udon) were used as challenge foods. We examined the LD-OFC results, including the induced symptoms and treatment required for positive LD-OFC results.

The LD-Egg, LD-Milk, and LD-Wheat OFC groups comprised 68, 42, and 13 participants, respectively. The positivity rates for the LD-Egg, LD-Milk, and LD-Wheat OFC groups were 7%, 24%, and 0%, respectively. Patients predominantly exhibited skin symptoms, and most were treated with oral antihistamines alone. None of the patients experienced anaphylaxis or required adrenaline injections.

Infants aged <1 year with food allergies can safely undergo LD-OFCs by consuming low doses of causative foods. Avoiding the complete elimination of causative foods is an important strategy for managing infants with food allergies when initially introducing causative foods.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable in the assessment and management of rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). They measure outcomes that may include symptoms, disease control, well-being, and health-related quality of life (QOL). PROMs for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis are often used before and after an intervention, for example, medication, therapeutic procedure, or, in allergic rhinitis (AR), allergen immunotherapy. Although widely used in clinical trials for AR and conjunctivitis, symptom score PROMs are less validated than disease control or QOL measures. The best validated PROM for AR is the Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, but there is no universally accepted criterion standard for symptom and disease control PROMs. For CRS, at least 15 different criteria have been used to assess disease control in clinical studies, but what CRS disease control means and how it should be measured are concepts in evolution. The most used QOL measure for CRS is the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. The use of PROMs to support clinical decisions and for shared decision-making for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis still has many challenges, including the selection of the preferred instrument, when and how to administer, the impact of comorbidities, and questionnaire fatigue for both patient and provider.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and allergic rhinitis (AR) usually represent the latest manifestations of the atopic march, sharing a common type 2 inflammation response. A relevant prevalence of AR in EoE cohorts has been widely confirmed. An increasing literature assessed the involvement of aeroantigens in EoE pathogenesis, focusing foremost on the seasonality of new diagnoses, symptoms, and response to therapy. Unfortunately, no diriment direction has been achieved, probably due to the retrospective design of the studies so far available, which chose surrogate markers of EoE activity (mostly the date of new diagnosis) which may be affected by geographical, logistic and personal factors, probably not dependent by the disease itself. EoE exacerbations reported in the context of the pollen levels (preferably pollen counts) may represent a more reliable marker. AR might promote the onset and the re-exacerbation of EoE through mechanisms that are both local (ie, massive exposure to airborne antigens mediated by post-nasal drip) and systemic (type 2 inflammation). Furthermore, AR may facilitate EoE onset by predisposing to pollen food allergic syndrome (PFAS), and EoE patients with PFAS reported higher rate of AR, thus suggesting a bond among these 3 conditions whose causative relationship have still to be ascertained. In addition, because of its shifting activity from Th2 to Th1 inflammation, several case reports focused on the effect of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) employed to treat AR in EoE patients. Also in this instance, no certainties could be guaranteed, although sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is more frequently reported to exacerbate EoE, while SCIT is mostly described as a remission adjuvant. The real life experience reported from our allergy service appears to confirm such hypothesis. Finally, a watchful eye should be reserved to monoclonal antibodies as a potential future option for concomitant EoE and AR. In light of all this, an attentive evaluation of allergic history of EoE patients should be relevant. Future perspectives should be addressed on prospective studies targeted to shed light on causative relations among airborne antigens, AR and EoE, and to viable comprehensive treatments.

Allergic rhinitis is a relevant and global health problem affecting up to 5-50% of the general population and its prevalence is increasing due to climate change and pollution among other factors and counts among the 10 most frequent reasons for medical consultation, generating an important economic impact. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only allergy-disease modifying treatment and there is plenty of evidence of its effectiveness with regards subcutaneous and oral routes of AIT.This narrative review article examines published literature in the last 24 months regarding the pharmacoeconomics of AIT versus standard of care treatment (SOC) for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Farraia et al. assessed in 2022 subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT, _438/$500.28) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) (_1021/$1116.19) plus symptomatic treatment versus SOC treatment in children with HDM-driven allergic asthma, measuring QALYs, decrease of medication, decrease of exacerbations and symptoms. They used the cost-effective threshold: _18 482.80 ($21 110.14), finding that AIT is cost-effective.Also, SCIT and SLIT plus symptomatic treatment was assessed versus SOC treatment in children with grass pollen allergic rhinitis. The authors concluded that SCIT (_933/$1065.67) and SLIT (_1408/ $1608.22) seem cost effective, particularly SCIT.

Allergen immunotherapy is cost-effective in the management of allergic rhinitis and asthma as compared with SOC alone. As most studies consider only during-treatment costs and no long term benefits or preventive effects are being assessed, the real cost-effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy could be even higher.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) on small airway dysfunction (SAD) and the underlying mechanism with a special focus on basophils.

Sixty-five children with mild to moderate asthma who were under regular inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment for more than 1 year but whose FEF75 remained below 65% of the predicted value and had positive results for serum Der p or Der f were enrolled. Children with asthma underwent house dust mite (HDM) subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) treatment for 1 year. Clinical symptoms and lung function were evaluated every 3 months during HDM SCIT treatment. Basophil activation test (BAT) was carried out before and after HDM SCIT treatment. RNA sequencing was performed in isolated basophils from peripheral blood after 6 months of HDM SCIT treatment, followed by GO term and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis between patients with and without HDM SCIT treatment.

HDM AIT treatment ameliorated clinical symptoms while concurrently improved lung function parameters, such as FEV1/FVC, FEF75, FEF50 and MMEF (p < .05). It is worth noting that FEF75 values showed a highly significant, gradual and persistent increase (from 49.55 ± 1.27% at baseline to 71.89 ± 2.64% after 1 year of therapy) and 22 of 35 patients no longer had SAD after 1 year of treatment. BAT results revealed that AIT treatment significantly reduced basophil activity to the inhalant allergen mixtures containing HDM in vitro challenge from baseline. GO term and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of basophils revealed that downregulated genes were mainly involved in immune cell activation, antigen presentation, and Th2 cell differentiation.

Our study demonstrated that HDM AIT not only improved SAD related lung function parameters, but also reduced basophil activity. RNA sequencing revealed the inhibition of phagocytosis and the phagosome pathway in basophils which may affect the polarization of Th2 cell differentiation after HDM AIT.

Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials of childhood allergic rhinitis (AR). Currently, there is a lack of some generally accepted biomarkers that may predict the clinical response to SCIT to eventually achieve personalized therapy. In this study, 28 children with AR received Der p SCIT for 26-30 months at baseline, and four efficacy endpoints, serum interleukin (IL)-5, periostin, Der p-specific IgE (sIgE), and Der p sIgG4, were measured by ELSIA. Clinical symptoms and characteristics were assessed by questionnaires, and the associations among periostin, Der p 2 sIgE and clinical efficacy were analyzed. The results showed that SCIT demonstrated a significant reduction in Der p 1 sIgE (P < 0.05) and Der p 2 sIgE (P < 0.01), an increase in Der p sIgG4 (P < 0.001) and an improvement in clinical efficacy at the fourth efficacy endpoint compared with that at baseline. A positive linear correlation was found in serum periostin and Der p sIgE (P < 0.05), Der p sIgG4 (P < 0.05), and clinical efficacy. Importantly, the concentration of serum Der p 2 sIgE showed a positive linear correlation with clinical efficacy and serum periostin (P < 0.05). These results suggest that SCIT can result in reduced type 2 cytokines and Der p sIgE and has long-term efficacy in children with AR. Der p 2 sIgE has a positive linear correlation with clinical efficiency and serum periostin and may be a useful biomarker for the prediction of SCIT.

Allergic asthma is the predominant phenotype among asthmatics. Although conventional pharmacotherapy is a central component in the management of asthma, it does not enable control of asthma symptoms in all patients. In recent decades, some uncontrolled asthmatic patients, especially those with allergic asthma, have benefited from biological therapies. However, biologics do not address all the unmet needs left by conventional pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that neither conventional pharmacotherapy nor biological therapies have disease-modifying properties. In this context, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents an indispensable component of the therapeutic arsenal against allergic asthma, due to its disease-modifying immunological effects. In this review article, funded by an AIT manufacturer, we find clinical trials support AIT as the only treatment option able both to improve allergic asthma symptoms and to prevent the onset and worsening of the condition. For patients with severe asthma or other safety concerns, the combination of AIT and biologics offers very promising new treatment modalities for the management of allergic asthma. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06027073.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping allergy and immunology by integrating cutting-edge technology to enhance patient outcomes and redefine clinical practices and research. This review examines AI's evolving role, emphasizing its impact on diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatments, and innovative research methodologies. AI has advanced diagnostic tools, such as models predicting allergen sensitivity, and enhanced immunotherapy strategies. Its ability to process extensive datasets has enabled deeper understanding of allergic diseases and immune system responses, leading to more accurate, effective and tailored treatments. Furthermore, AI is facilitating personalized care through AI-driven allergen mapping, automated patient monitoring, and targeted immunotherapy. The integration of AI into clinical practice promises a future where allergy and immunology are characterized by precisely customized healthcare solutions. This review adheres to PRISMA flowchart, with a comprehensive analysis of databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and preprint platforms using keywords related to AI and allergy and immunology. From an initial pool of 192 studies, 20 documents were selected based on inclusion criteria. Our findings highlight how AI is transforming allergy and immunology by enhancing patient care, research methodologies, and clinical innovation, offering a glimpse into the near future of technology-driven healthcare in these fields.